Please login to view this media

  • Talk
  • 15/09/2021
  • Canada

A CSORN Study: Comparison Between Primary and Revision Lumbar Decompression Outcomes

Description

In this presentation, Samantha Visva introduces her research on the outcomes of primary versus revision lumbar decompression surgeries, drawing on data from the Canadian Spinal Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) database. Samantha states that she has no conflicts of interest and discusses the clinical benefits and risks associated with revision spinal surgeries, which can include increased complications compared to primary surgeries. She highlights that existing studies have not sufficiently compared these groups, particularly using large national databases.



Throughout the presentation, she explains the methodology of her research: the study aims to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life post-surgery, hypothesizing that revision patients will report worse outcomes and less satisfaction than primary surgery patients. By collecting patient data on surgical procedures and health outcomes, Samantha emphasizes the importance of understanding these differences, noting that revision patients often face unique challenges due to factors such as older age and greater comorbidities.



Data from various quality-of-life measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EQ-5D, show that primary patients generally experience better clinical improvement compared to revision patients. However, surprisingly, patients who underwent revision surgeries reported higher satisfaction levels than their primary counterparts, leading to an exploration of patient expectations and outcomes in the literature.



Samantha concludes that while revision surgeries do not provide the same level of improvement as primary surgeries, the findings highlight the nuanced perspectives of patient satisfaction. She calls for further research to optimize outcomes for revision patients, noting the need for longitudinal studies that capture quality of life indicators not previously collected together. The presentation ends with gratitude for the audience's attention and an invitation for questions.

DOI: 10.1302/3114-220972

Specialties