Please login to view this media

  • Talk
  • UK

The Problematic Knee Replacement

Description

The video begins with Phil Hopgood discussing the pivotal role of guidelines in addressing the challenges associated with problematic knee replacements. He opens the session with a thank you to Andrew Toms and emphasizes the significant proportion of patients (10% to 20%) who experience discomfort or complications after knee replacement surgeries. Hopgood aims to convey critical insights about the BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association's audit of surgical treatment) guidelines designed to unify treatment access across regions, ensuring all patients receive equitable care regardless of their proximity to large medical centers.



The presentation stresses the importance of timely access to experienced consultants for patients with problematic knee replacements, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation and collaboration with multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for effective management. Phil outlines specific criteria defining cases that may benefit from revision surgery, emphasizing thorough patient assessments, including history taking, clinical examination, and routine screenings.



Throughout the detailed discussion, multiple potential diagnoses that may necessitate revision surgery are explored, such as stiffness, malalignment, extensor mechanism failures, and component loosening. Hopgood provides insights into the surgical complexities involved and stresses the necessity of engaging specialists and conducting MDT reviews for complicated cases. He also addresses the importance of patient management strategies and ongoing care pathways for those who do not qualify for further surgery. Finally, he reiterates the need for structured follow-up and collaborative approaches among medical professionals to optimize patient outcomes in knee replacement revisions.

DOI: 10.1302/3114-210407

Specialties