Description
In this VTT transcript, a panel discussion led by Dan Perry features several experts including Chris Bretherton, William Oliver, Rebecca Kearney, and Sandeep Deshmukh, who engage in a technical dialogue surrounding orthopedic studies, particularly focusing on the HUSH trial related to humeral shaft fractures. Chris raises an inquiry about eligibility criteria for the study, specifically seeking clarification on definitions of fractures. William explains that they utilize the Müller box definition for standardizing eligibility. The conversation touches upon statistics regarding the distribution of fractures, with William noting differences in morbidity between mid-shaft and proximal fractures. Rebecca's question about missing data highlights the challenges faced in data collection, with Sandeep detailing how they managed the missing data in their analyses and observing no significant demographic differences between responders and non-responders. As the discussion progresses, they contemplate the future implications of their findings on local practices and trial methodologies, with Alexandra mentioning the potential need for specialist hip surgeons due to impending retirements in the field. The meeting concludes with Dan summarizing the discussion and encouraging a collaborative effort to move forward with their findings.
DOI: 10.1302/3114-221690