Please login to view this media
- Talk
- 15/09/2021
- Canada
Time-Dependent Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes Differ Between Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Description
The presentation features Justin Drager from Tufts Medical Center discussing a study on the differences in clinically significant outcomes between patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Drager outlines the growing trend in reverse shoulder procedures over the past decade, attributing this to broadened indications. He highlights findings showing that reverse shoulder patients exhibit lower revision rates and similar outcomes in elderly patients with intact rotator cuffs, raising questions about postoperative improvements over the first two years following surgery.
The study aims to compare the time it takes for patients to reach specific outcomes—minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS)—in both surgery types while also identifying demographic factors influencing these outcomes. Results indicate that while 75% of patients achieve MCID within six months, reverse shoulder patients experience slower attainment of SCB and PASS scores compared to total shoulder patients, which contradicts initial hypotheses. The study’s conclusions provide valuable insights for setting patient expectations and improving counseling approaches in clinical practice.